The Regulatory Group, Inc.
Regulation Federal Rulewriting
Government Regulation Consulting
Federal Rulemaking Regulation Training
Regulation Rulemaking Resources
Government & Federal Regulation Clients
Federal Regulation Agency Contracts
Federal Rulemaking Regulation FAQ
Regulatory Group - Federal & Government Rulemaking Regulation Testimonials
Contact the Regulatory Group - Federal Regulation Drafting

The Regulatory Group :: Regulation Drafting Return to main Resource Library page. Return to glossary index
Mead Doctrine

The Supreme Court narrowed the scope of when Chevron deference is applied to agency actions in this 2001 case, US v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218, 121 S. Ct. 2164 (2001).

This decision held that "administrative implementation of a particular statutory provision qualifies for Chevron deference when it appears that Congress delegated authority to the agency generally to make rules carrying the force of law, and that the agency interpretation claiming deference was promulgated in the exercise of that authority."

The importance of this holding is that even if an agency action fails to qualify for Chevron deference, the agency action may still be subject to the lesser Skidmore deference based on the agency's own persuasiveness. (See Chevron U.S.A., Inc v. NRDC, 467 U.S. 837 (1984)).
Return to main Resource Library page. Return to glossary index

About TRG | Consulting | Training | Resource Library | TRG Clients | GSA Contracts | FAQs | Testimonials | Contact TRG | Home
© 2003-2007 The Regulatory Group, Inc. // Site created by Creative Sites Media   Site created by Creative Sites Media